Hype against randomized trials for one topic, computed and dated 30 October 2026. It rates the topic, never a person, and gives no dosing and no sourcing.
The short version
608Kyearly wiki viewsEnglish Wikipedia, to 30 Sep 2026
1,021randomized-trial paperstyped on PubMed
595views per trial paperlower is better backed
Receipts check outthe verdictby the published rule
Caffeine
Receipts check out
595yearly views per trial paper
hype608K views a yearproof1,021 trial papers
The trial record is deep next to the attention it gets.
English Wikipedia readers opened the Caffeine article about 608K times in the year to 30 September 2026. PubMed holds 1,021 papers typed as randomized trials for it, which is 595 yearly views per trial paper. By the published rule that earns the verdict Receipts check out.
That is a statement about the gap between attention and trial record. It does not say whether Caffeine works or whether it is safe for anyone.
How does it compare with the others?
Caffeine next to the other fourhype above, proof below, read 30 October 2026
Top chart: attention. Bottom chart: randomized-trial papers typed on PubMed. The highlighted bar is Caffeine. A big top bar over a small bottom bar is what the meter reads as hype ahead of the trials.